<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Limits to 2000 Follows &#8211; What are your Thoughts?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hongkongwong.com/2008/08/12/twitter-limits-to-2000-follows-what-are-your-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hongkongwong.com/2008/08/12/twitter-limits-to-2000-follows-what-are-your-thoughts/</link>
	<description>Pursue Your Passion and Live The 24/7 Vacation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 04:31:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ervin Jenck</title>
		<link>http://hongkongwong.com/2008/08/12/twitter-limits-to-2000-follows-what-are-your-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator>Ervin Jenck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hongkongwong.com/2008/08/twitter-limits-to-2000-follows-what-are-your-thoughts/#comment-705</guid>
		<description>This is certainly extremely good info. Many thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is certainly extremely good info. Many thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gtaylor1976</title>
		<link>http://hongkongwong.com/2008/08/12/twitter-limits-to-2000-follows-what-are-your-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-522</link>
		<dc:creator>gtaylor1976</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 03:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hongkongwong.com/2008/08/twitter-limits-to-2000-follows-what-are-your-thoughts/#comment-522</guid>
		<description>LOL! That is ridiculous for twitter to limit up to 2,000 people! it is a invaluable marketing tool and it seems to defeat the purpose it was created for.Maybe they need to come up with a id/captra system to lock out spammers from the actual people who want to make this communication tool work </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL! That is ridiculous for twitter to limit up to 2,000 people! it is a invaluable marketing tool and it seems to defeat the purpose it was created for.Maybe they need to come up with a id/captra system to lock out spammers from the actual people who want to make this communication tool work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caspar Aremi</title>
		<link>http://hongkongwong.com/2008/08/12/twitter-limits-to-2000-follows-what-are-your-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Caspar Aremi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hongkongwong.com/2008/08/twitter-limits-to-2000-follows-what-are-your-thoughts/#comment-121</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m all for the limit - already this week I&#039;ve had 5 or 6 requests from people who are following 1990+ users (I guess they hit 2000 and a few people blocked them) but only have ~40-50 followers themselves!  Makes them look like either spammers or desperate for friends.

I find new people based on those that I follow using the @ - I figure if they&#039;re interesting enough for my friends to reply to, they&#039;re interesting enough for me to read! ;) Or occasionally from reading blogs I like, most people link to their twitter profile now.  I dont want to be randomly added by someone using a bot just because they want to tell us about their new website or service.  I think it&#039;d be impossible for someone to actually follow 2000 people or more, unless they build it up very gradually.  I&#039;ve only got 250 and already I find it hard enough to remember who everyone is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all for the limit &#8211; already this week I&#8217;ve had 5 or 6 requests from people who are following 1990+ users (I guess they hit 2000 and a few people blocked them) but only have ~40-50 followers themselves!  Makes them look like either spammers or desperate for friends.</p>
<p>I find new people based on those that I follow using the @ &#8211; I figure if they&#8217;re interesting enough for my friends to reply to, they&#8217;re interesting enough for me to read! ;) Or occasionally from reading blogs I like, most people link to their twitter profile now.  I dont want to be randomly added by someone using a bot just because they want to tell us about their new website or service.  I think it&#8217;d be impossible for someone to actually follow 2000 people or more, unless they build it up very gradually.  I&#8217;ve only got 250 and already I find it hard enough to remember who everyone is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://hongkongwong.com/2008/08/12/twitter-limits-to-2000-follows-what-are-your-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hongkongwong.com/2008/08/twitter-limits-to-2000-follows-what-are-your-thoughts/#comment-115</guid>
		<description>Sylwia - I do use Twitter in similar ways.  Esp since I use it mostly from my mobile.  It also automatically updates my Facebook profile, which is kinda cool.  

I however am finding this limit thing to be a pain.  I want to follow more people but Twitter seems to have put a limit.  I&#039;ve emailed them and they have not responded!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sylwia &#8211; I do use Twitter in similar ways.  Esp since I use it mostly from my mobile.  It also automatically updates my Facebook profile, which is kinda cool.  </p>
<p>I however am finding this limit thing to be a pain.  I want to follow more people but Twitter seems to have put a limit.  I&#8217;ve emailed them and they have not responded!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylwia Presley</title>
		<link>http://hongkongwong.com/2008/08/12/twitter-limits-to-2000-follows-what-are-your-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylwia Presley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 21:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hongkongwong.com/2008/08/twitter-limits-to-2000-follows-what-are-your-thoughts/#comment-104</guid>
		<description>I use Twitter as a diary (now for instance I was travelling and resting from web access for a week, but updated my friends via twitter on what I did in Hungary). I use it as a communication tool but mainlt as information source - mainly on social media.

Restrictions - always are good, but what would Schoble say?;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Twitter as a diary (now for instance I was travelling and resting from web access for a week, but updated my friends via twitter on what I did in Hungary). I use it as a communication tool but mainlt as information source &#8211; mainly on social media.</p>
<p>Restrictions &#8211; always are good, but what would Schoble say?;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://hongkongwong.com/2008/08/12/twitter-limits-to-2000-follows-what-are-your-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hongkongwong.com/2008/08/twitter-limits-to-2000-follows-what-are-your-thoughts/#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Hey guys - thanks for the comments! 

I just discovered that you could apparently email Twitter to request them to consider lifting the limit.  I might do it after some more experimentations. I&#039;m still pretty new to Twitter tbh, as I joined a while back but never really used it.  I&#039;m starting to really love it tho.

I&#039;m trying an interesting experiment - as my friend Tim Ferriss suggested.  Tim believes that if he starts following anyone it makes it hard, so he doesn&#039;t follow anyone, whereas Scoble suggests the opposite.  

I&#039;m going to try both.  I&#039;m gonna go on a Twitter Diet, followed by a Twitter feast.  Then I&#039;ll report back.  But rest assured those that follow me, I will definitely follow back in the end :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys &#8211; thanks for the comments! </p>
<p>I just discovered that you could apparently email Twitter to request them to consider lifting the limit.  I might do it after some more experimentations. I&#8217;m still pretty new to Twitter tbh, as I joined a while back but never really used it.  I&#8217;m starting to really love it tho.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m trying an interesting experiment &#8211; as my friend Tim Ferriss suggested.  Tim believes that if he starts following anyone it makes it hard, so he doesn&#8217;t follow anyone, whereas Scoble suggests the opposite.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to try both.  I&#8217;m gonna go on a Twitter Diet, followed by a Twitter feast.  Then I&#8217;ll report back.  But rest assured those that follow me, I will definitely follow back in the end :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Fox</title>
		<link>http://hongkongwong.com/2008/08/12/twitter-limits-to-2000-follows-what-are-your-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hongkongwong.com/2008/08/twitter-limits-to-2000-follows-what-are-your-thoughts/#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Hey dude, great post, I agree with this wholeheartedly.  I think twitter&#039;s new changes will just deter people from using it in many ways.  If they are worried about spam, they should have a report option to block spammers.  Or a way to flag them up anyway. Lots of genuine people that just like to follow lots of others.  So this is a shame!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey dude, great post, I agree with this wholeheartedly.  I think twitter&#8217;s new changes will just deter people from using it in many ways.  If they are worried about spam, they should have a report option to block spammers.  Or a way to flag them up anyway. Lots of genuine people that just like to follow lots of others.  So this is a shame!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://hongkongwong.com/2008/08/12/twitter-limits-to-2000-follows-what-are-your-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 22:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hongkongwong.com/2008/08/twitter-limits-to-2000-follows-what-are-your-thoughts/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Very well said.
And also I like your ideas about twitter and the way you use it much.

Love

Ali</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well said.<br />
And also I like your ideas about twitter and the way you use it much.</p>
<p>Love</p>
<p>Ali</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Parker</title>
		<link>http://hongkongwong.com/2008/08/12/twitter-limits-to-2000-follows-what-are-your-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hongkongwong.com/2008/08/twitter-limits-to-2000-follows-what-are-your-thoughts/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>From a strictly marketing perspective, I would want to have many people following me, but I cannot manage to follow that many people myself. It would be information overload, and Tim Ferris even advocates a low-information diet and judicious use of Twitter, so the 2000 person follow limit is not so ridiculous.

I may not post anything particularly profound at times, but I try to add a little value every now and then in my tweets. However, I regularly review those I am following and remove those whose updates do not add any value to my life.

Short answer: the limit does not bother me. I am currently following just over 80 people and that feels like too many to me. I need to go back through them and trim down some.

Be well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a strictly marketing perspective, I would want to have many people following me, but I cannot manage to follow that many people myself. It would be information overload, and Tim Ferris even advocates a low-information diet and judicious use of Twitter, so the 2000 person follow limit is not so ridiculous.</p>
<p>I may not post anything particularly profound at times, but I try to add a little value every now and then in my tweets. However, I regularly review those I am following and remove those whose updates do not add any value to my life.</p>
<p>Short answer: the limit does not bother me. I am currently following just over 80 people and that feels like too many to me. I need to go back through them and trim down some.</p>
<p>Be well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obeoman</title>
		<link>http://hongkongwong.com/2008/08/12/twitter-limits-to-2000-follows-what-are-your-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Obeoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hongkongwong.com/2008/08/twitter-limits-to-2000-follows-what-are-your-thoughts/#comment-69</guid>
		<description>...is 2,000 people enough to learn from?

I think not!

Welcome to the bloggosphere-be sure to stretch your mind before venturing further!

Steve Obeoman
http://obeoman.blogspot.com
262-325-8687</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;is 2,000 people enough to learn from?</p>
<p>I think not!</p>
<p>Welcome to the bloggosphere-be sure to stretch your mind before venturing further!</p>
<p>Steve Obeoman<br />
<a href="http://obeoman.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://obeoman.blogspot.com</a><br />
262-325-8687</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
